Florida Supreme Court amends Rules and Creates Discipline Procedures for Parenting Coordinators

Effective November 7, 2019, the Supreme Court of Florida amends the Florida Rules for Qualified and Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators.

Part I states ethical standards for parenting coordinators. See Rules for Qualified and Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators Rules (“Parenting Coordinator Rules”) 15.000 – 15.200.

Parenting coordination is alternative dispute resolution focused on children.A parenting coordinator assists parents in creating or implementing a parenting plan. They facilitate resolving disputes by educating them, making recommendations to them, and, with court and their prior approval, making limited decisions.

Parenting coordination is based on communication, education, negotiation, facilitation, and problem-solving. Parenting coordinators integrate skills and knowledge they’ve drawn from mental health, law, and conflict resolution. Rule 15.020.

Discipline Procedures

The Talent Pool:

“PCRB” – Parenting Coordinator Review Board – 20 people, 4-year terms (3-term max)

  • 6 judges
  • 10 qualified parenting coordinators from professions eligible to be qualified parenting coordinators under section 61.125, Florida Statutes. At least 5 must be nonattorney parenting coordinators.
  • 4 Florida attorneys licensed at least 3 years with substantial family practice. Not qualified as parenting coordinators, not judicial officers during terms on PCRB, but who know and have experience with parenting coordination practice, statutes, procedures.

“RVCC” – Rule Violation Complaint Committee – Investigates the complaint.

  • 3 members of Parenting Coordinator Review Board – 1 judge or attorney (Chair of RVCC) + 2 qualified parenting coordinators.
  • The RVCC disbands after the Panel disposes of the case (and related cases as the Chief of Alternative Dispute Resolution deems appropriate) to which it is assigned.
  • Rule 15.270 grants RVCC jurisdiction and powers to conduct the proper and speedy investigation and disposition of any complaint.

The judge or attorney chairing the RVCC may compel:

(1) the attendance of any person at an RVCC meeting;

(2) any person to give statements, testimony, and depositions; and

(3) production of documents, records, and other evidence;

The RVCC shall perform its investigatory function and have concomitant power to resolve cases prior to panel referral.

“Panel” – 3 members of the PCRB the DRC selects who didn’t serve on the RVCC adjudicates the formal charges associated with a rule violation complaint.

Each panel shall have jurisdiction and powers to conduct the proper and speedy adjudication and disposition of any proceeding before it. The panel shall perform the adjudicatory function, but shall not have any investigatory functions.

The panel chair may:

(1) compel the attendance of witnesses;

(2) issue subpoenas to compel the depositions of witnesses;

(3) order the production of records or other documentary evidence;

(4) hold anyone in contempt prior to and during the hearing;

(5) implement procedures during the hearing;

(6) determine admissibility of evidence; and

(7) decide motions prior to, during or subsequent to the hearing if related to the hearing.

Contempt – Rule 15.280(b) authorizes the chair of an RVCC or panel to hear motions for contempt or to hold anyone in contempt for conduct during the RVCC meeting or panel hearing. The chair files the order of contempt in the local court. The circuit court issues orders and judgments as the court deems appropriate.

Rule Violation Complaint Process (Rule 15.290)

Any person or the DRC files a Rule Violation Complaint with the DRC. If an individual files the complaint, it must be written, sworn to under oath, and notarized using a form the DRC supplies. If the DRC files the complaint, it doesn’t have to be sworn or notarized, but must be signed by the Chief of Alternative Dispute Resolution or DRC staff attorney.

The DRC assigns the complaint to the 3-person Rule Violation Complaint Committee (RVCC) and informs it of the parenting coordinator’s prior sanctions history, if any.

In 10 days after receiving a complaint from an individual, the DRC notifies the complainant of the receipt. The RVCC has a conference call to determine whether the allegations, if true, would constitute a violation of the parenting coordinator rules. If the RVCC finds the complaint facially insufficient, it dismisses it without prejudice and notifies the complainant, who may refile within 20 days. If the RVCC finds the complaint facially sufficient, it lists the rule or rules the parenting coordinator may have violated and submits the list to the DRC.

The DRC serves the parenting coordinator with the list of alleged rule violations, the complaint, and a link to the rules in effect at the time of the alleged violation.

The parenting coordinator has 20 days from service to file with the DRC a sworn, written response.

Before or after the parenting coordinator’s response, the RVCC may direct the DRC to appoint an investigator to assist the RVCC and the RVCC may investigate the complaint if the RVCC chair authorizes the investigation. The investigation may include: meeting with parenting coordinator, the complainant, and anyone else.

To resolve the matter, the RVCC may meet or communicate with the complainant and parenting coordinator, together or separately.

The parenting coordinator may agree to sanctions. Rule 15.320. The DRC distributes any consent agreement including sanctions to all circuits through the chief judges, all trial and appellate court administrators, and the ADR directors. The rules the parenting coordinator violated and consent agreement (with confidential information redacted) get published on the DRC’s page that will be on the Florida Courts’ website https://www.flcourts.org/Resources-Services/Alternative-Dispute-Resolution/Rules-Discipline-Sanctions

If there’s been no disposition, the RVCC reviews the complaint, response, any investigative report, underlying documentation, and determines if there’s probable cause to believe the alleged misconduct occurred and would constitute a violation of the parenting coordinator rules. 

If NO probable cause, the RVCC dismisses the complaint with prejudice and advises the complainant and parenting coordinator in writing. The decision is final.

If YES probable cause, the RVCC may:

  • Order formal charges be drafted and forwarded to the DRC for assignment to a panel.
  • Decide not to proceed by filing an order of nonreferral explaining why and advise the complainant and parenting coordinator.

Hearing Panel Procedures (Rule 15.300)

Upon an RVCC’s referral of formal charges to the DRC, it must send the formal charges to the parenting coordinator and complainant.

The DRC retains a Prosecutor and may retain a panel adviser.

The DRC assigns the case (and may assign related cases) to a hearing panel.

Absent stipulation of the parenting coordinator and PCRB or good cause, the DRC sets the hearing for a date 30 – 120 days from the assignment.

Before the hearing, the accused parenting coordinator may admit to charges and panel may impose sanctions.

The Hearing (Rule 15.300(i))

The Panel Chair must be physically present. The Florida Evidence Code applies.

Unless the parenting coordinator claims a privilege or right properly available under federal or state law, the parenting coordinator may be called as a witness to make specific and complete disclosure of all matters material to the issues.

Rule 15.300(i)(6) gives the parenting coordinator the rights:

  • to defend against all charges
  • to examine and cross-examine witnesses
  • to compel the attendance of any witness to testify
  • to compel production of documents and other evidence through the panel’s subpoena power.

Burden of Proof (Rule 15.310): The Prosecutor bears the burden of proof for rule violations. The burden of proof is clear and convincing evidence. Rule 15.310.

Confidentiality (Rule 15.350): All complaints alleging misconduct against parenting coordinators subject to disciplinary action under Florida’s Parenting Coordinator Rules, including the parenting coordinator’s response and all other records made or received during the complaint procedure, are exempt from public disclosure under Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.420(c)(3)(B). These materials stay confidential until a finding of probable cause or no probable cause is established, regardless of the outcome of any appeal.

Review (Rule 15.370): Within 30 days of panel’s written decision, the parenting coordinator whom the Panel sanctions or finds has violated the Parenting Coordinator Rules may seek review by the chief circuit judge or designee of the circuit that qualified the parenting coordinator in the case that gave rise to the underlying action. The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure control to the extent applicable or as modified by procedures for qualification and appeals of discipline of parenting coordinators as adopted in each circuit. The parenting coordinator invokes the circuit court’s jurisdiction to review disciplinary action by submitting an original and one copy of a Notice of Review of Parenting Coordinator Disciplinary Action to the chief judge of the circuit or designee within 30 days of the panel’s written decision. A copy shall be provided to the DRC. A copy of the panel decision shall be attached to the notice. The standard of review of disciplinary action is competent substantial evidence.

Read Florida’s 2019 Parenting Coordinator Disciplinary Procedures

Florida Mental Health Treatment Providers & Informed Consent Requirements

Florida Parenting Plans – Consent to Child’s Mental Health Treatment

Florida Family Law: Parental Responsibility and Decision Making

Florida Family Law: Shared Parental Responsibility and Sole Parental Responsibility

Florida Family Law: Shared Parenting – Retained Consent to Mental Health Treatment

Amended Florida Parenting Plan Law Mandates Each Parent’s Retaining Consent to Mental Health Treatment

Florida Collaborative Practice: Shared Parental Responsibility for Health Care

Florida Collaborative Process: Clarifying Parents’ Intent About “Mental Health Treatment”

Florida Family Law: What is “Mental Health Treatment”?

Florida Collaborative Practice: Example Language for Collaborative Practice Team Using Definitions of “Mental Health”

Florida Mental Health Treatment Professionals – Informed Consent By One Parent or Guardian

What If One Parent Disagrees With Other Parent’s Decision to Consent to a Child’s Mental Health Treatment?

Follow & Like:
Skip to content